MINUTES
OF THE TWENTY-NINTH meeting
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT FORUM, 19 SEPTEMBER 2006,
| Present: |
See attached list (Annex 1) |
| Apologies: | David Cairns, Peter Gregson, Stephen Kingon, Peter McNaney, Lord Rana, Ann Marie Slavin, MarkSweeney |
1.
WELCOME AND APOLOGIES / MINUTES OF LAST
MEETING / MATTERS ARISING
1.1 The Chair welcomed members to the 29th
meeting of the Forum. She also welcomed the
DFP Minister, David Hanson, attending for the first two items.
1.2 The Chair informed members that Declan Billington (CBI), Frank Bryan
(IOD) and Mark Sweeney (CBI) would be replacing Michael Maguire (IOD),
1.3
Members were informed that Peter Gregson (QUB) had replaced John Mann
(QUB) as Higher Education representative.
1.4
The Chair welcomed representatives of the political parties to the
meeting.
1.5
The minutes of the last
meeting were accepted.
Matters Arising
Planning
Figures
1.6 The Chair reminded
members of the presentation given by the Planning Service at the June meeting
and of members’ request that further figures be provided. She directed members to these figures on
paper 2.
1.7
Members asked that
further information on major planning application figures be provided.
ACTION: Secretariat
to ask the Planning Service for further information on figures.
Economic
Sub-Group of the Assembly
1.8
The Chair reminded members
that the Assembly had established an Economic Sub-Group to consider the
economic challenges facing NI. She
advised that the Sub-Group had published its first report and would continue to
meet every Thursday until 19th October.
1.9 Members were informed
that EDF had been invited to give evidence at the initial sessions but EDF’s
reasons for not giving evidence (the Economic Sub-Group was taking evidence from
a wide range of Forum members; the Forum as a whole had not taken a position on
issues such as an economic package) had been accepted. The Chair informed members that the Economic
Sub-Group had asked again to meet with a delegation from EDF. She advised that
1.10
Political
representatives proposed that the Economic Sub-Group’s first report would
benefit from consideration by members at a future meeting. It was agreed that, given the operating
timeframe of the Economic Sub-Group, members should be provided with a copy of
the current report and invited to submit written comments to the political
representatives. It was also agreed that
this first report and any future material would be considered as an agenda item
for the next plenary meeting.
ACTION: Secretariat
to forward Economic Sub-Group report to members and invite them to submit
written comments on the report.
ACTION: EDF Sub-Group Chairs to consider including the work of the Economic Sub-Group
on the agenda for the December meeting.
2.
REFORM
AGENDA
2.1 David Hanson introduced DFP’s paper on the
Reform Agenda. He outlined that his task
was to develop an agenda that could be taken forward by a devolved government
and that would result in a more dynamic and sustainable economic future for NI. He highlighted that the Reform Agenda aimed
to modernise government in NI by making it more reactive to local communities, more
efficient and more cost effective.
Minister Hanson referred members to the update paper which outlined the
mechanics of this reform under the headings of review of public administration,
water reform, rating reform, welfare reform, civil service reform and
communications. Minister Hanson concluded
that the proposed changes would offer better services for customers, increase
the efficiency of the public sector and allocate more control to local
councils. He emphasised that all funds saved
would be reinvested in NI.
2.2 Members agreed on the importance of
reviewing and improving the public sector, particularly given the recent changes
to local councils. However, some members
expressed concerns about the ways in which these improvements were being made,
in particular that the various aspects of the Reform Agenda needed to be more
fully integrated.
2.3 Noting that Minister Hanson had stressed
that the new rates system would be a fairer system, some members insisted on
the need to ensure that the most disadvantaged benefit.
2.4 Some members also expressed concerns that
the impact on public sector personnel was being overlooked. It was also noted
that the loss of disposable income to individuals, which would result from
reform, may lead to a downturn in spending and thus have a negative effect on
the economy. It was suggested that this
might be countered by growth in the private sector and members pointed to the
need to develop an economic sustainability plan.
2.5 The role of EDF as a medium for
consultation in the preparation of this agenda was also raised, and it was
agreed that it was a useful forum for further consultation before decisions
were made.
2.6
Some members also felt that the report did
not fully attend to many of the difficult issues. Some noted that industrial de-rating was not
mentioned, and highlighted that a decision needed to be reached on this matter
for the manufacturing sector.
2.7 Members enquired what measures were in
place to ensure that the potential savings would be achieved. Members pointed to the need to set targets on
the various issues to ensure clarity on the outcomes of the Reform Agenda.
2.8
Minister Hanson responded by noting that
major changes such as the Reform Programme required time to implement and measure,
and highlighted again that reform would lead to a more efficient and modern
form of government that would contribute to the production of a sustainable
economic future for NI.
3. DRAFT
REGIONAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY (RES)
3.1 David Hanson set the context for a consideration of the draft RES by
highlighting its role in tackling long term structural problems. He reminded members that it addressed a
number of challenges facing the economy, including those facing education and
the private sector, the need to increase economic prosperity and to improve
productivity.
3.2 Mike Brennan informed members that a number of minor amendments had been
made to the draft that they had considered in June, including revisions to ensure
consistency with the NI Sustainable Development strategy and the expansion of
the skills section. He advised that he
would welcome comments, both verbally and in writing after the meeting.
3.3
During discussion a number of suggestions
were offered by members and the political representatives, as follows:
| - |
The RES should outline clearly what steps will by taken and who will be responsible for each measure; |
|
| - |
Targets should be set and incorporated into
the strategy; |
|
| - |
The document needed to be more politically
sensitive, clarifying the benefits of economic efficiency when referring to
All-Island benefit and reflecting the positions of two governments; and |
|
| - |
The strategy should also attend to:
telecoms; regulations on migrant labour; and the benefits of Further Education
for local students. |
3.4 Mike Brennan agreed with the importance of establishing
targets but pointed out the difficulties of looking forward, as public
expenditure was only set for the next four years. Members discussed the difficulties in setting
NI targets in relation to the
ACTION: Secretariat to invite members
to submit written comments on the strategy to DFP.
ACTION: DFP to work with MTSPs
Sub-Group to agree targets for the strategy.
4. FOOD
FORESIGHT PRESENTATION
4.1 John Gilliland, Chair of the Food Foresight
Leadership Group of the Food Strategy Implementation Partnership, gave a
presentation which highlighted the key challenges facing the NI agri-food
industry to 2020. The remit of the group
had been to produce recommendations to support a sustainable agri-food industry
in NI. It consisted of members with
expertise in broad areas, who consulted with stakeholders and produced a report
(due for completion in autumn 2006).
4.2 Discussion focused on the amount of
investment needed by the agri-food sector to become sustainable and on what the
sector would contribute to the economy in monetary terms in return for this
investment. John Gilliland advised
members that the group had focused more on the effect of the industry not
responding to the challenges of future years and noted that currently the
sector is not sustainable.
4.3
Methods of tracking future developments in
the sector were also discussed and it was noted that the Innovation Sub-Group
had been developing annual tracking measures which might be useful for the
Foresight Leadership Group. It will be
essential to appoint a champion who would put a robust reporting system in
place, but John Gilliland admitted it would be difficult to find someone with the
ability to engage across disciplines and departments.
4.4 Members noted that the next stage of work
for the group would involve identifying strategies to deliver the group’s four
key visions.
5. SUB-GROUP REPORTS
Innovation Sub-Group
5.1
Enterprise
Sub-Group
5.2
Members were advised that the Enterprise
Sub-Group had held a productive meeting on Friday 15th September and
would circulate a written update on the group’s progress as soon as possible.
ACTION: Secretariat to forward Enterprise Sub-Group report to members.
Skills
Sub-Group
5.3 Michael Maguire, Chair of the Skills
Sub-Group, gave an update highlighting current work including the alignment of
EDF objectives with DE and recommended
that EDF could usefully look at education’s role in widening opportunities for
young people. He reported on the series
of recommendations being produced following the review of careers
guidance. Members also received an
update on the group’s work on prioritisation for the development of the FE
sector.
ACTION: EDF
Sub-Group Chairs to consider including a presentation by
Infrastructure Sub-Group
5.4 Jim McCusker, Chair of the Infrastructure Sub-group,
advised members that the report on the capacity of the public sector to deliver
the Investment Strategy for NI (ISNI) imminent. In any revision of ISNI
the view of the sub-group was that the economic benefits should be paramount
and that there was a need to prioritise projects to produce meaningful economic
results.
MTSPs Sub-Group
5.5 Seamus
McAleavey, Chair of the MTSPs Sub-Group, advised members that EDF’s annual
statement was being prepared and would be considered by the Sub-Group. He reported that as part of its annual
monitoring role the Sub-Group had commissioned Regional Forecasts to produce a
report on six scenarios for the future economic development of NI. This report was being considered by the
Sub-Group.
6. ANY OTHER
BUSINESS
Future
Agenda Items