MINUTES OF THE THIRTy-FIFTH meeting
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FORUM, 12 JUNE 2008, STORMONT
HOTEL
Present: See
Annex 1.
Apologies: Mark Sweeney,
John Gilliland, Seamus McAleavey, Bob Stronge, Jim McCusker, Tom Gillen.
Action Points agreed at
6 March Plenary: See Annex 2.
1
WELCOME,
APOLOGIES AND MINUTES OF LAST MEETING
1.1
The Chair welcomed members to the 35th meeting of the EDF at
the Stormont Hotel. She
outlined her commitment to working closely with members to achieve the economic
goals set out in the Programme for Government and noted that the scale of the
challenge was such that it required the co-ordinated efforts of all
stakeholders. She informed Members she would be leaving the meeting early due
to another commitment and that Stephen Quinn would assume the Chair.
1.2
Members were advised that this meeting would see the introduction of new
members representing the IoD, CBI and NICCI, namely, Joanne Stuart, Brian Ambrose and Bro McFerran who
are replacing Frank Bryan, Declan Billington and Mark Sweeney
respectively. The Chair welcomed the new
members and new
attendees, Bill Montgomery, John
Hood and Will Taylor.
1.3
She advised that the minutes of the plenary meeting on 6 March had been
agreed by Members, by email, and posted to the EDF website.
2
MATTERS ARISING
Progress on March Action
Points
2.1
The Chair referred Members to Paper 2 which outlined the progress made
against action points from the plenary meeting on 6 March. The paper was noted by Members.
3.
SKILLS – PUBLIC
SECTOR RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS ARISING FROM SKILLS PRESENTATION (MARCH EDF)
3.1
Members were
reminded that, at the March plenary meeting, Declan Billington, Chair of the
Skills Sub-Group, gave a presentation outlining the business perspective on
skills gaps/shortages. The presentation included a number of recommendations
mainly relating to public sector activity/intervention and, in particular, to
3.2
Minister Empey
outlined the policy initiatives which
3.3
He advised
members that whilst
3.4
However, he
emphasised that, following the recent US/NI Investment Conference, it was
important that DEL were kept informed of the skills needs of foreign investors
whilst noting that DEL would continue to work in partnership with Invest
NI to ensure such needs can be met. He
referred to evidence of the effectiveness of the similar
3.5
Minister Empey
stressed that there must also be a focus on reskilling/upskilling the existing
workforce. He noted that
3.6
With regard to
the promotion of degree-level courses in STEM subjects, he noted that there may
be a need to provide scholarships/bursaries to students to incentivise uptake.
He stressed that businesses also have an important contribution to make in this
regard.
3.7
The Chair thanked
Minister Empey for his comments and invited Will Haire to respond on behalf of
the Department of Education (DE).
3.8
Will Haire noted
that a clearly identifiable career path for young people from the age of
fourteen was essential to enable young people to make informed decisions on
which subjects/courses they should select. He emphasised that businesses had a
particular responsibility to ensure that clarification is provided to schools
on career opportunities/paths and on the skills and qualifications required
from job-seekers. He noted that quality engagement between employers and
schools is essential to ensuring that both parties understand businesses’
skills needs and opportunities.
3.9
On behalf of
DETI, Graeme Hutchinson advised that the Terms of Reference (ToR) for a
research study forecasting skills requirements (to meet goals set out in the
PfG) had been drafted and that Business Alliance representatives had provided
helpful advice on the content and focus of the ToR. He noted that the research should
be completed by Autumn 2008. The ToR are available through the EDF Secretariat.
3.10
John Hood
provided an outline of Invest NI’s work with Momentum with the aim of enhancing
the attractiveness of a career in the ICT sector and welcomed the marketing
initiative which
He advised that Invest NI is working closely with
3.11
The Chair invited
Declan Billington to comment on the public sector response to the
recommendations relating to addressing skills gaps and shortages.
3.12
Declan Billington
reminded members that the purpose of the skills presentation (delivered at the
March EDF meeting) was to stimulate discussion across the Forum on current and
future skills needs. He welcomed the response from the public sector whilst
noting that, if NI is to continue to attract high value-added FDI, the skills
needed for the future must be identified and developed now. He noted that this would
require some risk-taking but that this must be recognised and accepted by all
stakeholders, including the public sector and Executive, as necessary to meet
the overall aim of a highly-skilled, flexible workforce. He agreed with Minister
Empey on the need for a strong partnership between key stakeholders and
stressed the need for businesses to engage in dialogue with
3.13
He noted that the
ICT model adopted by
3.14
Stephen Kingon
advised that the NI talent pool was one of the key factors in attracting FDI.
Bro McFerran informed members that NI had considerable talent in both
managerial and technical skills. Wilfred Mitchell stressed the importance of
ensuring the education system is producing appropriately skilled young people
if NI is to continue to attract FDI.
3.15
Patricia McKeown
noted that partnership is key to ensuring an appropriately skilled workforce.
She emphasised that the public sector in particular is committed to upskilling
its employees and the approach demonstrated within it provides a useful model
for the private sector. However, there is a need for further evidence of other
effective models. Trevor Neiland advised that different sectors required
different interventions and hence there is a need to experiment, undertake
pilot initiatives and learn from successes and failures.
3.16
Ian Crowe noted
the work which the Workforce Development Forums (WDF) are taking forward regarding
skills needs. He advised that small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) have
found the last twelve month period particularly challenging, with declining
margins and consequent reductions in staff numbers. However, he emphasised that
this is the time when SMEs need to continue to invest in staff to ensure they
are well-placed to avail of future opportunities.
3.17
Minister Empey
noted that the Workforce Development Forums are based around the regional
college structure and their role is to discuss and identify skills needs
relevant to a particular locality. The WDFs are developing and are proving an
effective structure. He advised members that an All Island Skills Conference
would be held in the
3.18
Peter Bunting
agreed that a partnership approach was essential to addressing the skills issue
and suggested that a tripartite model, involving trade unions, employers and
government should be considered.
3.19
Minister Murphy
noted that the significant investment in infrastructure now and in coming years
will generate a high demand for certain skills and referred to current shortages
in the supply of engineers. He recommended that efforts to identify future
skills needs should take account of, and reflect, planned expenditure under the
ISNI/Budget/PfG.
Stephen Quinn noted that the discussion had raised
important issues in relation to skills gaps/shortages in addition to those set
out in the March Skills presentation and which should be recorded by the
Secretariat and circulated to members.
ACTION: EDF Secretariat to provide members with
details of additional issues/recommendations arising from today’s discussion
relating to skills gaps/shortages.
4.
VARNEY II - UPDATE
4.1
The Chair advised
Members that, since the March EDF meeting, the 2nd Varney Review had
been published and referred members to Paper 4 which contained the Executive Summary
to the Review. She asked Michael Brennan
(DFP) to update members on next steps following the publication of the report.
4.2
Michael Brennan
reported that the Varney report outlined many issues relating to the economy
with which members were already familiar. He noted that the report had
concluded that the future of the NI economy lay in the hands of the Executive
and had endorsed the Executive’s decision to place the economy as top priority
within the PfG. He advised members of DFP concerns that the report failed to
recognise a number of difficulties faced by NI including the need to meet the CSR
efficiency savings targets, achieve the £1.1bn asset disposal target (over a
three year period) and deal with the inherent problems within the planning
process.
4.3
He advised
members that there were certain recommendations which needed to be addressed
including a review of planning, a review of Invest NI and noted that the
Finance Minister will respond to the review, having first sought the views of
his Executive colleagues. He also mentioned that there are finance issues which
will be addressed to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
4.4
The Chair thanked Michael for the update on progress and invited
comments.
4.5
Patricia McKeown informed members that, whilst the Report stated that
high wages in the public sector were having a detrimental impact on the private
sector, she did not believe this was an accurate reflection of public sector
wages given many public sector employees are working at the minimum wage level.
She noted the importance of the public sector to the NI economy in terms of
employment and also in relation to procurement opportunities.
4.6
Minister Empey
noted that the Varney report had focused on the high levels of economically
inactive in NI relative to the
4.7
With regard to
the Varney recommendation relating to the disposal of public sector assets, he
advised that, whilst he endorsed this approach, caution was needed to ensure
best value-for-money was achieved.
4.8
4.9
Stephen Kingon
observed that the conclusions of the Review appeared to have been
pre-determined and noted that the Review had significantly underestimated the
scale of the challenge facing NI. He also commented that the Review had failed
to identify the tools necessary to address weaknesses in the economy and noted
that it was incumbent on all stakeholders to rebut those recommendations which
added little of benefit in efforts to address challenges to competitiveness. He
stressed that it was of particular importance that all partners, including
government, responded to the Review setting out their concerns with its
conclusions and recommendations.
4.10
Declan Billington noted
that the key message from the Review was that NI must look inward to find ways
to address the challenges facing the economy. He emphasised that the key to this
will be to ensure that the NI workforce has the right skills for the future and
noted that this was the main market failure facing the business sector. Brian
Ambrose concurred with this view and noted that there were no quick fix
solutions to the issues raised.
4.11
Minister Murphy noted
that the Review was a reiteration of the Treasury view of NI and the same
issues had been raised now and in the past citing the example of the sale of
4.12
Michael Brennan advised
members that Minister Dodds will write to the Chief Executive of the Treasury
to outline outstanding concerns.
4.13
The Chair agreed that there was a need to respond to the Varney report
and advised that the Executive will be providing a response to HMT in the near
future.
5.
5.1
The Chair invited Bill Montgomery to update members on the recent US/NI
Investment Conference and referred members to Paper 5. Bill Montgomery
delivered a presentation outlining the numbers in attendance/events, announcements
on projects/jobs, conference costs, media coverage and Invest NI’s follow up
plans to ensure that opportunities arising are fully exploited. The Chair
invited members to respond to the presentation.
5.2
Patricia McKeown noted that she was concerned that NI was being
marketed as a relatively low-wage destination and the image this may present of
the quality of professionally skilled labour in NI. She commented that
the presentation did not include a reference to the establishment of the
Emerald/Pension Fund, noting that she was impressed by the willingness of the
public sector workers and unions based in
5.3
Bill Montgomery advised that Invest NI do not promote
5.4
Frank Bryan noted that it was important that the EDF put on record their
congratulations to Invest NI and all concerned in arranging the Conference for its clear success.
5.5
Will
5.6
Declan Billington
asked Bill Montgomery to advise on the actions which Invest NI required of the
Executive to ensure that opportunities arising from the Conference
materialised. Bill Montgomery advised that, at present, the biggest challenge
is the difficult economic environment. However, he noted that it was of
particular importance that NI had the skills sought by investors and informed
members that those companies in attendance at the conference were particularly
impressed by the flexibility of local colleges in responding to investors’
skills needs. He also drew member’s attention to the need to minimise
bureaucracy in processing cases/projects. On the positive side, he advised that
low commercial property costs represent a significant selling point for NI.
Wilfred Mitchell queried whether the complexities of the planning process in NI
presented difficulties for foreign investors. Bill Montgomery advised that this
was rarely a problem and that Invest NI works closely with companies/Planning
Service to ensure that issues regarding planning approval are addressed at an
early stage.
5.7
Aideen McGinley
stressed that it is of particular importance that
5.8
The Chair thanked
Bill Montgomery for the update on the Conference and noted her congratulations
to Invest NI on the success of the Conference.
The Minister left the meeting and Stephen Quinn chaired the meeting from
this point.
ACTION:
Invest NI to provide an update to the EDF in June 2009 on the impact of
the US/NI Investment Conference.
6.
EDF REVIEW
6.1
The Chair
reminded members that a Review of the EDF had been conducted over the last
quarter. He referred members to Papers
6, 7 and 8 and suggested that today’s discussion should focus on the
recommendations regarding the way forward for the EDF (as outlined in Paper 8.)
He advised members that the Review had focused on four key areas, namely, the
Terms of Reference, Agenda, Sub-Group Structure and Membership of the EDF.
6.2
Terms of Reference - Beginning with the revised Terms of Reference
for the EDF, he invited members to provide comments - members noted that they
were content to accept the revised Terms of Reference.
6.3
Future Agenda - The focus of the Agenda for the September 2008, December 2008 and
March 2009 EDF meetings was discussed and the Chair directed members to
Paragraph 3 of Paper 8 which set out proposals for the Agenda for these
meetings.
6.4
The Chair asked
Bob Barbour, who had proposed Exports as a future agenda item, to outline his
views on current export activity and the challenges in encouraging businesses
to engage in exporting. Bob Barbour proposed that the September 2008 EDF
meeting should focus on Exports in the Tradable Services Sector as there is
limited understanding/knowledge of the challenges faced by companies in this
area. In responding, Stephen Kingon noted that Invest NI is currently
undertaking related work on export activity which would not be complete in time
for the September meeting. He recommended that a later date for an
export-focused EDF meeting should be considered by members to enable the work
being undertaken by Invest NI to be reflected in any future discussion at the
EDF plenary meeting on this issue.
6.5
Frank Bryan proposed
that a future EDF meeting (within the next 9 month period) should focus on
Innovation. He drew member’s attention to the importance accorded to Innovation
in the PfG and to the work of MATRIX whose report was due at the end of June
2008. He also emphasised that it was particularly important to monitor progress
against the actions identified in the Action Plan to the Regional Innovation
Strategy. David Sterling noted that it was unlikely that work arising through
the Matrix report and the RIS Action Plan would be at a sufficiently advanced
stage for discussion at the September EDF meeting.
6.6
Minister Murphy
advised members that DRD have commenced a major review of the Regional
Development Strategy (RDS) which would guide regional development out to 2025
and which would also consider development at the sub-regional level. He
informed members that the Review is being taken forward at a number of levels
with various working groups having been established to advise on the Review. He
noted that the Review would have far-reaching implications across the region
and, therefore, recommended that a future EDF meeting should include a focus on
progress with and the emerging findings of the Review. However, he noted that
it may not be necessary to place the Review as the key agenda item for the EDF.
Minister Murphy advised that the Review
would be completed in 2010 and that an update in 2009 to the EDF may be
appropriate.
6.7
Peter Bunting
noted that the Terms of Reference for the Forum refers to the establishment of
a social partnership model as the basis for the EDF. He advised members that he
had proposed “Social Partnership” as a future agenda item for EDF as he
believes it is important to debate and reach agreement on the type of social
partnership model which NI requires.
6.8
The Chair noted
that whilst there were a number of proposals for forthcoming meetings it was
important to reach agreement at this point. He suggested that the focus of the
September 2008, December 2008 and March 2009 meetings should be on Innovation,
Skills and Exports respectively. Members
endorsed this proposal.
6.9
Sub-Group Structure – The Chair reminded members that it had been
proposed that existing sub-groups should be stood down and should be replaced
by issue specific, time-bound groups. Members agreed to this proposal.
ACTION: EDF
Secretariat to liaise with Mike Thompson (DRD) on a future date for an update
to the EDF on progress with the Review of the RDS.
ACTION: EDF
Secretariat to consider and identify (based on proposed agenda items): where
there is a need to establish a sub-group and the composition of the sub-group.
6.10
Membership – The Chair noted that the issue of the membership of
EDF was an area for consideration as part of the Review and asked members to
comment on the current/future membership of the Forum. Patricia McKeown suggested
that it may be appropriate to extend membership to IntertradeIreland. The Chair
noted that, as it was likely to take some time to reach agreement on the issue
of future membership of the Forum, this should be given further consideration
at a later point. Members agreed to this approach.
ACTION: Members
to give further consideration to future membership of the EDF.
7. VISION
SUB-GROUP UPDATE
7.1 The Chair advised members that Papers 9 and 10 provided an overview of the current work of the
Skills and Innovation Sub-Groups and asked Declan Billington to provide an
update on the work of the Skills Sub-Group. Declan outlined the work of the
group over the previous quarter. He noted that it would be particularly helpful
if
ACTION:
7.2