9th MEETING OF
EDF INNOVATION SUB-GROUP ON 3rd NOVEMBER 2006
Attendees: Frank Bryan, IOD (Chair)
Gerry
McCormac, QUB
Bernie
Hannigan, UU
Bob
Barbour, C for C
David
McAuley,
Boyd
McDowell,
Graeme
Hutchinson, DETI
Anne
Conaty, DETI
Tracy
Meharg, Invest NI
Trevor
Newsom, QUB
Eddie
Friel, UU
Alan
Blair, ANIC
John
D’Arcy, ANIC
Edel
Lamb, DETI
WELCOME / APOLOGIES
1. The Chair welcomed members,
Tracy Meharg, Trevor Newsom, Eddie Friel, Alan Blair, John D’Arcy and Boyd
McDowell to the 9th meeting of the Innovation Sub-group. He noted apologies from Chris Conway, Wilfie
Hamilton and Stephen Kingon.
2. The Chair noted that the
minutes of the Sub-group’s 8th meeting on 6 September 2006 had been
agreed by members via email.
MATTERS ARISING
NI
Science Industry Panel (NISIP)
3. Anne Conaty informed
members that the first meeting of the NI Science Industry Panel would take
place on Wednesday 8th November and would be accompanied by a press
release. Members were advised that the
Panel would be formally launched at its second meeting on 16 January 2007.
4. Members were reminded that
the Panel will be a business-led panel that will advise DETI and its minister
on research-led science policies.
Professor Damien McDonnell OBE will chair the Panel. Frank Bryan is also a member of the Panel and
will provide a point of contact with the Innovation Sub-Group. Other NISIP members are: Colin Elliot,
Professor Jim McLaughlin, Dr Clare Passmore, Dr Brian Keating, Ed Vernon, Rotha
Johnston, Professor Bernie Hannigan, Professor John Mann, and John D’Arcy.
HE/FE
COLLABORATION FUND
5. Trevor Newsom, Eddie Friel
and Alan Blair gave a presentation on the HE/FE Collaboration Fund. This outlined the strategic context for the
proposal and the need for HE/FE Collaboration.
The presentation highlighted that the proposal for the Fund had been
developed following widespread recognition of the need for businesses to engage
in R&D and innovation to increase global competitiveness. It emphasised that the proposal had been
drawn up in liaison with the Business Alliance, who had highlighted the need
for a central unit to provide seamless interaction with the relevant business
solution provider in the Education sector.
6. The
presentation outlined the strands of the proposed programme, which include
promoting HE/FE services, knowledge transfer project delivery and internal
knowledge transfer. It also indicated
the intended outcomes of the Fund, and its potential risks and constraints.
7. Members
expressed widespread support for the proposal. However, during discussion they questioned the
extent to which the work of the HE/FE Collaboration overlapped with the work of
other agencies, such as Invest NI and the Centre for Competitiveness. Presenters advised that they were keen to
take this opportunity to avoid duplication of effort, but also noted that it
was the intention of the HE/FE Collaboration Fund to provide the best possible
way of working with business.
8. Members
asked how interest in the initiative would be stimulated, and were advised that
this would be achieved in a number of ways, including hosting events and
cold-calling.
9. Members
also suggested that it would be necessary to clarify the Fund’s objectives in
the proposal. HE/FE representatives
informed members that the proposal was work in progress and invited members to
submit comments and suggestions.
ACTION:
EDF Secretariat to invite
members to submit comments on the HE/FE Collaboration Fund Proposal to Boyd
McDowell by Friday 17 November.
ACTION: Universities and ANIC
to forward final proposal to
REVIEW OF THE REGIONAL
INNOVATION STRATEGY (RIS)
10. Anne Conaty updated members
on the review of ‘Think, Create, Innovate – the Regional Innovation
Strategy’. Members were advised that the
outcomes of this review, carried out by Deloitte were positive. The review agreed with the key drivers of the
RIS and indicated that a fundamental shift in Innovation policies would not be
necessary. It noted that there were
positive indicators that progress had been made in the business sector, in
particular with smaller companies. The
overall recommendation of the review was that the established priorities and
objectives should continue to be the vision.
It also recommended that the EDF Innovation Sub-Group and the NI Science
Industry Panel should continue in their challenging roles.
11. The review, however, did
note the need to widen involvement of the tradeable services sector, to seek
greater HE engagement with research councils, and to incorporate independent
and external scrutiny. It also noted
that there was no positive evidence that the innovation message was being
conveyed to micro businesses. The review
also recommended that the RIS needed to pay increased attention to
education.
12. In response to the review,
members agreed on the need for a robust Innovation Strategy. They discussed the need for NI’s universities
to compete on an international level for funding and the need to communicate
the benefits of nanotechnology to businesses.
While members agreed with the review’s suggestion that
nanotechnology is a cross-cutting theme rather than a sector in itself, they
disagreed with the report’s suggestion that nanotechnology is overvalued.
13. The review also suggested
that the RIS should be action-based rather than aspirational. Members were advised that DETI would
establish an Inter-Departmental Working Group to take this forward and to
develop a post-2006 strategic action plan.
Members agreed that they were content with this way forward.
UNIVERSITIES
APPROACH TO THE ECONOMY
14. Gerry McCormac and Bernie
Hannigan presented a draft of the universities’ paper ‘The Current Economic
Impact of the
15. Members discussed potential
ways of encouraging businesses to contribute to research both in the short and
long term. It was noted that creating
opportunities for co-funding of PhDs would be a useful way forward. Members also discussed the benefits of
improving the capacities of the business sector to undertake research. The need to ensure consistency between
increasing PhDs and the needs of the economy at a subsectoral level was also
raised.
ACTION: EDF Secretariat to circulate the
universities’ report to all EDF members.
GLOBAL
TRACKING OF INNOVATION
16. Anne Conaty reminded
members that the Sub-Group had previously asked DETI to prepare a paper on where
innovation opportunities are arising around the world and where NI might be
best placed to take advantage of these.
She advised members that while it is not for government to direct the
private sector towards specific markets or innovative technologies – such
market-based decisions are best carried out by businesses themselves – it can
sign-post businesses to sources of advice including DTI’s Global Watch team,
the Foreign Commonwealth Office, the UK Foresight programme, NI’s NICHE
Technology Horizon Scanning Panels, and the Innovation Relay Centre based at
Invest NI. NI’s Innovation Relay centre
has been identified as being one of the top 5 in
ANY OTHER
BUSINESS
Sub-Group Report for December Plenary Meeting
ACTION: EDF Secretariat to prepare a
short progress report for the December 2006 plenary meeting for clearance by the
Chair. This should include a note on the
HE/FE Collaboration Fund, the Universities’ paper on their approach to the
economy and on the post-2006 Innovation Policies that DETI will be
taking forward.
Date for
Next Meeting
17. It was agreed that a
meeting be arranged in advance of the March 2007 plenary.
ACTION: EDF Secretariat to liaise with members on
a date for the next meeting in early February 2007.
Items for
the Agenda of the Next Meeting
18. Members requested that
Centres of Excellence be included on the agenda for the next meeting of the
Sub-Group meeting.
ACTION: Invest NI to liaise with the
universities and the Centre of Competitiveness and produce a brief paper on
world-class Centres of Excellence within NI and throughout